I’ve spoken about this before in a number of seminars and webinars, but I don’t think I’ve ever written about it. Not long ago, an agent who had attended one of my webinars asked about an article on why you should never say on a certificate of insurance (or elsewhere) that a umbrella or excess liability policy provided “following form” coverage.
I’ve seen contracts with these kinds of requirements if limits are provided by umbrella or excess policies:
- “Excess or umbrella liability policy is follow-form with no additional exclusions.”
- “Umbrella (excess) liability insurance is ‘Following Form’ to the General Liability Policy (meaning no additional exclusions that aren’t already on the CGL policy). Y or N.”
The “following form” requirement usually means that the umbrella or excess policy is expected cover everything covered by the underlying policies. The reality is that this is almost never the case. Many/most umbrella and excess policies have exclusions or an absence of coverage for exposures covered by underlying policies.
For example, an exclusion for damage to rented premises is common, with no exception for fire damage legal liability (FDLL) coverage or the ISO CGL’s open perils coverage that is provided for temporary rentals of 7 days or less. Here is an example of a primary policy exclusion and the FDLL exception:
“‘Property damage’ to property rented to, occupied by or in the care of an ‘insured’. This exclusion does not apply to ‘property damage’ caused by fire, smoke or explosion.”
Here is the exclusionary language in the excess policy:
“Property Damage to property owned, rented or occupied by you….”
As you can see, the excess policy provides no exception for fire, smoke or explosion.
Defined terms such as “bodily injury” and “property damage” are often different and may effect lesser coverage in the umbrella/excess policy than the underlying CGL or auto.
Umbrella/excess policies often exclude auto UM/UIM coverage or, more commonly, provide a UM/UIM limit less than the liability limit.
IRMI’s CGL reference manual set includes an analysis of the common umbrella/excess policies in the marketplace and might also address “following form” issues. You have to subscribe to this reference material to review that. For a good free article from IRMI about following form issues, click here.
There is always a danger when you use verbiage on a certificate of insurance to describe coverage that is different from the actual policy language. Terms like “following form,” “blanket,” and “all risk” are terms we should resist using since they often serve as a noose in which the certificate holder hopes the agent will stick his or her head in.
Photo by CreditDebitPro
Latest posts by Bill Wilson (see all)
- The 180-Day ACV vs. RC Notice Myth - July 28, 2020
- Couldn’t Happen To Me - July 15, 2020
- COVID-19 and Business Interruption Insurance Podcast - June 22, 2020