I know this will be CGL 101 for many of you, but two inquiries/comments in the past couple of days have come to my attention. One was in response to this question on an agent association discussion board:
“An HVAC customer is closing his business. I have not yet canceled his CGL policy because of concern about completed operations should he be sued next year for a faulty installation that occurred several years ago.”
One of the agents responding to this question commented:
“The occurrence should go back to when the gas line wasn’t hooked up properly (that is the cause of loss) and coverage was in place during that time….”
Another agent association got an email coverage inquiry from a member agent that said this:
“I just need to make sure I’m correct in what I’m telling the insured. One of our insureds sent me an email over the weekend stating he just received notice of claim for a job done 6 years ago. We have had the insured for 5 years so the claim should be reported to the agent that had him insured when the job in question was done. Is this correct?”
Both of these comments are incorrect if we’re talking about this ISO CGL insuring agreement language:
“This insurance applies to ‘bodily injury’ and ‘property damage’ only if…The ‘bodily injury’ or ‘property damage’ occurs during the policy period….”
The policy that responds to a claim for BI or PD is the policy in force at the time of the BI or PD regardless of when the alleged negligence occurred. This is something that is usually taught in licensing school and should be common knowledge, yet I find repeatedly that this is not the case.
Bill Wilson
Latest posts by Bill Wilson (see all)
- The Invisible But Potentially Catastrophic Homeowners Exclusion That’s Not An Exclusion - September 19, 2023
- Revisiting the Illusory Coverage Assertion Following a Claim Denial - September 19, 2023
- FREE Webcast: How to Survive and Thrive in a Hard Market - August 1, 2023
Sorry Bill but you need retraining. the ISO has added a coverage trigegr under the CGL that says the policy in force when the insured or designated represenatative knew or reasonably should have known is the policy that responds not the current one.
The policy that responds to a claim is still the one in force at the time of the BI or PD. The “Montrose” and “known loss” language you refer to is an attempt to limit coverage under multiple policies for the BI or PD, as explained in this white paper I published 18 years ago:
https://www.independentagent.com/Education/VU/SiteAssets/Documents/PDF/MontroseWhitePaper.pdf